Abstract:
Artificial intelligence literacy is a comprehensive set of skills, knowledge, and ethical considerations that are essential for the responsible and efficient integration of artificial intelligence into daily activities. Nevertheless, there is currently a lack of a comprehensive framework that enables the comprehensive analysis of all aspects of digital stories in a broad sense. By providing an analytical framework that allows the authors to evaluate digital stories generated by students from a variety of perspectives, this study endeavors to address this gap. The authors employ this paradigm to illustrate how learners can leverage the diverse modalities of digital tales to improve their comprehension of the curriculum, while simultaneously creatively expressing their identities and perspectives. Throughout their involvement in AI learning and digital story writing activities, the interviews with students were designed to investigate their perspectives on learning.
References
Boud, D. (2001). Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001(90), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.16
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publication.
Frazel, M. (2010). Digital storytelling: Guide for educators. International Society for Technology in Education.
Hafner, C. A., & Miller, L. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning environment. Language, Learning and Technology, 15(3), 68–86. https://doi.org/10125/44263
Hill, S., & Grinnell, C. (2014). Using digital storytelling with infographics in STEM professional writing pedagogy. 2014 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2014.7020367
Ivala, E., Gachago, D., Condy, J., & Chigona, A. (2013). Enhancing student engagement with their studies: A digital storytelling approach. Creative Education, 04(10), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.410A012
Julie, H., Alyson, H., & Anne-Sophie, C. (2020). Designing digital literacy activities: An interdisciplinary and collaborative approach. 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274165
Kandlhofer, M., Steinbauer, G., Hirschmugl-Gaisch, S., & Huber, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence and computer science in education: From kindergarten to university. 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757570
Kolb, D. A. (2020). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Pearson Education.
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
Ng, T. K., & Chu, K. W. (2021). Motivating students to learn AI through social networking sites: A case study in Hong Kong. Online Learning, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2454
Scanlon, E., Anastopoulou, S., Kerawalla, L., & Mulholland, P. (2011). How technology resources can be used to represent personal inquiry and support students’ understanding of it across contexts. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(6), 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00414.x
Sormunen, K., Lavonen, J., & Juuti, K. (2014). Crossing classroom boundaries in science teaching and learning through the use of smartphones. (H. Niemi, J. Multisilta, & E. Löfström (eds.)). University of Helsinki, CICERO Learning Network.
Wong, G. K. W., Ma, X., Dillenbourg, P., & Huan, J. (2020). Broadening artificial intelligence education in K-12. ACM Inroads, 11(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3381884
Wu, F., Lu, C., Zhu, M., Chen, H., Zhu, J., Yu, K., Li, L., Li, M., Chen, Q., Li, X., Cao, X., Wang, Z., Zha, Z., Zhuang, Y., & Pan, Y. (2020). Towards a new generation of artificial intelligence in China. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(6), 312–316. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-0183-4
